To me, this seems true for all three platforms.

But a person without Krishna consciousness, must act selfishly due to not have the central connection with the source of life. Someone may try to water the leaves of the tree, but the proper place to water is the root. Therefore, to serve Krishna means to serve the whole, and to serve the parts, means to actually neglect the whole.

In Krishna Consciousness everything can be used as a vehicle for elevation,and especially the meduim of art.

And what if someone who dwells in the spiritual platform is also interested in art for example. Is it the intention of whether or not it was for krishna? or the fact that he/she is doing something that is considered “in the name of philanthropy”?

Thank you for your patience.

The third eye means the eye of wisdom. With the material eyes you can see physical incidences, and of course we must try to interpret those experiences with our intelligence. The third eye is the eye of spiritual discrimination. In other words, it is the pure intelligence by which one can understand the unseen spiritual force and how it is working and interacting with the material energy.

Your third question is nice. It is a different interpretation of the usages, but I think it is a great summary, because one who has spiritual vision will see this world as a school for spiritual development, whereas the materialist is always caught in acts of pounds and shillings calculations for various profit schemes.

In fact the person who is on the platform of passion only outwardly cares about the material state of society. The truth is, such persons only care about their own personal and extended satisfaction of their own senses. So, ultimately without the spiritual vision, then a person is self interested in the name of philanthropy.

With that being said, can immaturity and maturity exist on all three platforms regardless if the individual knows it or not?

What you are saying is exactly my point. There are problems in this world, but on the toddler points his finger at someone else and says they did it, and walks away. The adult actually stays around to clean up the mess.

So pointing finger anyone can do, but the mature soul who cares, tries to do something about it.

So, the important point is to fix the mess and the mess of society begins within the individual. A society is composed of individuals, so we don’t have control over the society, but we do have some control over our reaction to the problems of society.

If people are concerned with the state of the world, then that is the animalistic platform. Human beings are meant for extended awareness; the foundation of compassion.

I believe both the government and the self hinder the spiritual and material life. People are materialistic (and therefore spiritually oppressed) because they assimilate into the culture imposed on them by the government.

Both objects (the picture up top and video on bottom) should be taken as equal value in order to have a real spiritual revolution.

The host said it himself, it is difficult to live a simple life because the circumstances placed upon the people actually guide them into a path of spiritual destruction.

I understand that there are things which we are not able to directly measure like love and hate, but is there more to the third eye other than cultural discretion?

Is the third eye, the symbolic eye that perceives the world as either a milking farm and/or a school?